Wednesday, July 06, 2005

Another Note on the Study of Bisexuality

People are reacting quite harshly to the study on sexual arousal in bisexual males described in the previous post, especially in the comments here (Lindsay actually takes a level-headed approach to the study, though some of her commenters do not), here, and here. One commenter even went so far as to label the research "Bell Curve-esque," arguing that no matter how good the study is, we should not accept it, writing,
"Reform" in this case is capitulation to an anti-democratic, anti-human agenda, couched in terms of "scientific freedom of inquiry."
This level of hyperbole is just plain absurd, especially coming from people who haven't read the study! Criticize Bailey for being dramatic and going beyond his data, but don't dismiss scientific results just because you don't like them, or argue that studies on the topic of sexual arousal in different groups shouldn't be done. The questions that motivate such research are interesting, and potentially important. It's true that some people, including (perhaps) Bailey will misuse the results, but that's where scientists and supporters of scientists have to step in and say, "No! Look at the data, not the spin." That's what I tried to do in the last post, but for the most part, people commenting on the study have been blinded by the NYT spin (which is, in part, Bailey's spin).

I personally think the study raises all sorts of interesting questions about sexual orientation, the relationship between subjective and physical arousal in different contexts, the connection between sexual attraction and physical arousal, and so on, that are largely unanswered and warrant further research that can shed a great deal of light on human sexuality. It's a damn shame that the New York Times, Bailey (though not entirely -- see again the quote from the discussion section of his paper in the previous post), and the blog commenters are ignoring those questions, that all of them are doing so for ideological reasons, and in the case of the blog commenters and, in all likelihood, the NYT reporter, without having read the fucking research. You simply cannot evaluate a study based on an article about it in the New York Times (a fact, I should note, that Lindsay is well aware of, and is even now looking to the research reports before she comments further on the topic). It is undeniable that ideology can drive scientific work, but it is also undeniable that even ideologically-driven research can raise interesting questions and lead to new, interesting, and important research directions.

Here, by the way, are some quotes from the research article that explicitly avoid some of the ideological-biases that Bailey displays in the NYT quotes:
Sexual orientation refers to the degree of sexual attraction, fantasy, and arousal that one experiences for members of the opposite sex, same sex, or both.
Note that here, unlike in the article, Bailey and his students define sexual orientation with reference to much more than simple physical arousal.
In terms of behvior and identity, bisexual men clearly exist. Skepticism about male bisexuality must therefore concern claims about bisexual feelings, that is, strong sexual attraction and arousal to both sexes. The primary methodological challenge for investigating this issue is to employ a measure of sexual feelings that does not depend on self-report. At present, this is possible only for genital sexual arousal.
In other words, bisexuality does exist, but questions about it remain. This study is an attempt to answer one of those questions, and the authors note that their ability to do so is extremely limited because only genital sexual arousal is easily and reliably measurable. This qualifies any interpretation of the data they gather, and they note this both in the introduction and discussion sections of the paper. Furthermore, the finding of subjective arousal clearly shows the existence of strong sexual attraction to both sexes, even if this attraction does not correlate with genital sexual arousal. Once again, this means that the study raises more questions than it answers, but the questions are interesting, and should be explored.

11 comments:

Bora Zivkovic said...

Here's the material for your post #3 on this topic:
http://news.scotsman.com/index.cfm?id=745962005

Chris said...

Oh god. I don't think I could post on that report, or even that research, without typing an expletive four or five times per sentence. Why, oh why, did you have to show me that?

Chris said...

bza, I thought of that too, because I've had a similar experience with bisexual friends (they liked men sometimes, women sometimes, and both sometimes). It would be interesting to see if bisexual arousal levels while viewing male-male or female-female vidoes varied over time in a way that straight and gay male arousal levels didn't.

Bora Zivkovic said...

Sorry! Expletives were streaming out of my mouth while I was reading that, too. I wanted to let someone calmer to comment on that - I do not want to lose the PG ratings of my blog, either.

(Though I wouldn't mind seeing YOU use a bunch of expletives, ha-ha).

Bill12 said...

All information about erectile dysfunction available here http://www.starpills.com
For more information about weekend pill cialis find you here http://www.impotencehealthcenter.com If you want to try best ed pill in europe
try this site http://www.levitraportal.com
Viagra Great sites powerfull information about ed medicien impotence cure

Levitra Best online help for impotence problems,

Cialis Perfect night for men and women.

Anonymous said...

Generic Levitra help mens to treat very popular problem as ED. Best regards.

Anonymous said...

I originally buy viagra

from my Doctor when I went in for a physical that my work required. He gave me cheap viagra

Sample Pack that had six pills. I tried to buy viagra

before without any luck. the next night (Friday) I got really hard in about 20 minutes. I took a shower before we went to bed and basically had a hard on the whole time. I was able to flex my penis harder than normal. When I got out of the shower I came into bed, still with a rock hard erection- When my wife saw me at full attention, she asked "What got into you!?" I did not tell her I had purchase viagra

Pill, but that I was just super horny. We had a very good sex session- she had an orgasm, and I was able to keep it up during "reverse cowgirl", which is her favorite sex position. Last weekend while we were playing around, she even took a picture of erections to show her girlfriends at work! At first I told her "no way".

I am not sure yet if I am going to use viagra alternative

like cialis online

or to buy cialis online

since I have never try to use internet for buying drugs.
my friend told me I can Buy Cialis

some place but I am not sure if it is safe,

also I never used cialis before, I think I will purchase viagra


since prices are cheaper , so maybe It is better to use online pharmacy to buy viagra


then to buy cialis


online,
Doctor gave me various samples to choose from: generic cialis


viagra online
,
Generic Viagra

, Brand versions of them. I liked Brand Viagra the most. Now my sexual life is as good as ever, whenever I know I’m going to get laid, I pop the blue pill in my mouth an hour before the act. Brand Viagra literally saved my sexual life.

Anonymous said...

buy viagra online

viagra price

cheap viagra

buy viagra online

VIAGRA ALTERNATIVE

purchase VIAGRA

VIAGRA DISCOUNT

Generic Viagra

cheap viagra

viagra online

purchase viagra

viagra alternative

viagra discount


buy viagra

viagra price

viagra online

viagra online


viagra alternative

purchase viagra

purchase viagra

viagra online

purchase viagra

buy viagra online

purchase viagra online

buy viagra online

viagra sale

purchase viagra online

buy viagra online

buy viagra

purchase viagra online

purchase viagra online

buy viagra online

buy viagra

order viagra

cheap viagra

buy viagra online

viagra alternative

purchase viagra

viagra discount

buy viagra online

viagra price

purchase viagra online

viagra sale

Xander said...

I think this is great that we have a lot of Online Pharmacy no prescription. Cause it is easier to save money with them. For example, I want to buy Viagra online or buy Cialis online or buy Levitra online, then I just go to my favorite Canadian Pharmacy no prescription and get generic levitra. I choose it because this medicine works fine for me. My friend had some problems with health, his doctor prescribed him some antibiotics, so he spent about one thousand dollars!!!! If he knew about that pharmacies, he could save a lot of money and no physician needed.

Negocio Inversiones said...

I just want to emphasize the good work on this blog, has excellent views and a clear vision of what you are looking for.

buy accutane said...

While it has many side effects, in some ways it is safer than long-term antibiotic usage. Side effects that are buy accutane common are listed here.. It reduces the amount of oil released