Sunday, March 06, 2005

Concepts IV: A Second Revolution1

In the first three posts on concepts (here, here, and here), I talked about the three types of theories that have dominated cognitive science for the last several decades. First there was the classical (or definitional) theory, which cognitive scientists inhereted from the ancient Greeks. Then there were the similarity-based theories, the most prominent of which were the prototype and exemplar theories. Recently, there has been somewhat of a revolution in the cognitive scientific study of concepts, and these theories have begun to lose their monopolistic grip on the minds of concept researchers. To understand why things are changing, we first have to understand some of the things that these three ostensibly different theories have in common, other than the fact that they are all seriously flawed in some way. Here's a list of some important and, for many, troublesome commonalities.
  1. Concepts are natural kinds. In fact, they are of one kind. The first assumption is important, because it means that concepts can be studied like any other natural kind, using the empirical methods of science. The second means that we can use the same model to describe all concepts (perhaps tweaking some of the parameters in different contexts). Thus, all concepts are definitions, or prototypes, or collections of individual exemplars.
  2. For reasons that may have more to do with the culture of science than any practical or empirical considerations, in the study of concepts, the focus of both the emipirical research and the theories themselves has been almost exclusively directed at classification. Theories are designed to explain how people classify instances as members of concepts, and experiments use classification tasks to test the theories. Theories about how concepts are represented are designed, implicitly or explicitly, to allow the theories to explain how instances are classified.
  3. Concepts are represented by collections of features. The dominant view of reference in concept research is this: concepts carve the world at its featural joints. Whether these features are represented as necessary and sufficient, or as the dimensions of a multi-dimensional space, they tend to be the only information that is explicitly represented in concepts. Any other information is implicit in the representation of the features themselves.
  4. Concepts are amodal. That is, they can be represented digitally (e.g., in a big-ass matrix that represents a multi-dimensional space), without considering the fact that they are represented in an embodied mind.
What if concepts aren't of one kind, but of multiple kinds? What if classification is not the primary use of concepts, or if other uses significantly influence how they are learned and represented? What if features play a secondary role in many concepts, with relational information being more central? What if concept learning and representation is dependent on the embodied or situated nature of the mind? Changing views of how to answer these questions have led many researchers to approach concepts from directions that are not compatible with the three types of theories I have described so far. In fact, there has been a sort of revolution in the study of concepts, and new theories differ from the classical, prototype, and exemplar theories in that they do not have at least one of the four assumptions above. In this post, I'll describe one type of theory, derived from the "theory theory," which, to some degree, get rid of the first three assumptions.

The "theory theory" of concepts began with an incredibly insightful but intuse paper by Greg Murphy and Doug Medin (M&M), titled "The Role of Theories in Conceptual Coherence."2. Given the influence and insight of this paper, it could deserve a place on the list of the hundred most influential works in cognitive science, were it not for the fact that it has been so difficult to figure out exactly what to do with it. For the most part, the paper, written in 1985, and cited at least 300 times (that was the count a couple years ago), there was virtually no empirical research designed to test its claims until the 2000s. The reason is that it's not really clear what its claims are. The goal of the paper is to show that current theories of categories (i.e., exemplarand prototype theories, along with their hybrid rule-based cousins) can't explain one of the most important aspect of concepts: their coherence. The paper begins with a Biblical example, to present the problem of coherence. M&M write:
A somewhat unusual, but nontheless usefrul example, arises from an old puzzle of biblical scholarship, the dietary rules associated with the abominations of Leviticus, which produce the categories clean animals and unclean animals. Why should camels, ostriches, crocodiles, mice, sharks, and eels be declared unclean, whereas gazelles, frogs, most fish, grasshoppers, and some locusts be clean? What could chameleons, moles, and crocodiles have in common that they should be listed together? That is, what is there about clean and unclean animals that makes these categories sensible or coherent? (p. 289, emphasis in original)
They then argue that it is the fact that the current theories are similarity-based that makes it impossible for them to account for conceptual coherence. Adding:
These approaches are inadequate, in part, because they fail to represent intra- and inter-concept relations andmore general world knowledge. (p. 289)
To address this inadequacy, M&M propose that concepts are interwtined with our theoretical knowledge of how the world works, and that concept-representations are, at least in part, determined by that knowledge3. Thus, this theory differs from its predecessors in important ways. It is not similarity-based, it allows for many different kinds of concepts (they're all based in our knowledge of the world, but different concepts can have very different structures or kinds of representations), the focus is on representational coherence rather that classification, and features fall out of concept-representations embedded in theories, rather than composing them. For M&M, the structure and coherence of a conceptual representation comes both from within the concept itself, in the form features and the relations (causal, thematic, etc.) between them, and from outside the concept, in the general world knowledge within which the concept is embedded.

But what does all of this really mean for concept research? Does it mean that concept representations look like theories? For one, it seems to take us backwards, rather than forwards, in that theories likely specify necessary and sufficient conditions, or at least lead us to believe that they exist. This is actually a benefit, in this case, however, because people actually do believe that concepts have essences, or definitions, though the representational place-holders for these essences tend to be pretty devoid of content4. But what else does it mean? Are concepts represented as theories? But aren't theories composed of concepts? How, then, are theories represented? In the end, M&M give us only a vague answer to the problem of coherence, which serves more as a road sign pointing us down the road that leads away from similarity than as a destination. More questions are raised than answered.

For nearly 15 years after the publication of "The Role of Theories in Conceptual Coherence," people cited it, often enthusiastically, but were unable to really provide any empirical investigation, or even operational characterization, of the theory that it seemed to contain. Fifteen years in the life of a science in its infancy, or of any science in the age of specialization, is a lifetime. Most theories don't make it that far, at least not in a form that is recognizable given their initial characterizations. Yet, the theory theory was thriving despite no real characterization. The bulk of the early work on the theory theory was designed to show that background knowledge plays a role in categorization and concept formation. While this work was very interesting and important, it was not impcompatible with similarity-based (particularly prototype) theories.

There were some early attempts, particularly by Alison Gopnik and her colleagues, to make the theory theory itself more coherent. She treated everyday knowledge as theory-like, composed of our folk theories of various domains. Concepts, then, embodied the causal knowledge contained in those folk theories5. Kinds, of which concepts are the representations, are for us defined by their causal relations.Gopnik has argued that this take on the theory theory provides a very nice explanation for early naming and cancept development. In essence, children learn concepts and their names, at least those that refer to kinds, by developing and revising theor folk theoretical knowledge of the world, and thus developing more and more sophisticated knowledge about the types of causal relations in which particular kinds can participate.

This characterization was made even more viable by recent work on causal reasoning, particularly that by Woo-Kyoung Ahn, in which it has been shown that causal reasoning itself involves a top-down process in which theoretical knowledge about kinds determines our characterization of causal relationships6. This work, in turn, has led to what is perhaps the most sophisticated formulation of the theory theory, the causal-model theory. Under this theory
Knowledge of causal relationships between category features is represented in terms of asymmetric and probabilistic causal mechanisms... [and] objects are classified as category members to the extent they are likely to have been generated or produced by those mechanisms.7 (p. 709)
In other words, concept membership is not determined by overall similarity to a representation, but by adherence to theoretically-derived causal knowledge. In fact, similarity and typicality themselves are determined by causal knowledge. This version of the theory theory allows us to connect concepts and categorization to our broader knowledge of memory, reasoning, and folk knowledge, by making concepts schematic, and thus composed of both features and the (mostly causal) relations between those features.

As evidence for the causal-model theory, Bob Rehder, who has developed the causal-model theory, cites research demonstrating that causal knowledge influences how typical members of a category are8, that violations of category knowledge make instances less likely to be classified as members of a category9, and that coherence built around causal knowledge makes individuals better members of categories10. What's more, with this version of the theory theory, Rehder has been able to test it empirically! To do so, he presented participants with exemplars that either contained the sorts of feature co-occurence relationships that participants' causal knowledge would predict, or did not contain these co-occurence relationships. Participants rated those that did as better members of categories. Rehder then showed that a formal version of the causal-model theory fit the data better than similarity-based models. The causal-model theory looks something like this (From Rehder, 2003):
P(A|E) = LA(E)/[LA(E) + LB(E)]
In this equation, the probability (P) of classifying an instance as a member of category A given the presence of property E is a function of the likelihood (determined through a Bayesian probability calculation) of the presence of E given the causal model of concept A (LA(E)), divided by the likelihood of E given that causal-model and the likelihood of E given an the causal model of an alternative classification, concept B (LB(E)). Thus, the probability of classifying an instance as a member of a concept is determined by the chance that its features are predicted by the our causal knowledge embodied in that concept and the chance that its features are predicted by our causal knowledge embodied in alternative concepts. This model thus captures all of the important features that we ant out of a theory of concepts: it handles typicality, by measuring the extent to which exemplars contain the features predicted by causal relations, the interrelations between features, and the interrelations between concepts, including the role of context in classification. Furthermore, because it is not only focused on classification, it allows us to describe other important aspects of concepts, such as their formation and use in non-classification tasks (e.g., inference).

There is another benefit of the theory theory, which has recently begun to receive the attention of researchers. As some in both philosophy and psychology have recently noted, concepts may not be of a single kind. However, similarity-based theories have always treated them as of a single kind, and have thus been forced to focus almost exclusively on noun or object concepts. It may be that concepts differ in their structural properties, how they are processed, or, given the theory theory, in the types of causal theories that influence their content. Thus, concepts from different domains may be entirely different kinds of things. It would do not good, then, to try to develop a general theory of how concepts are represented, processed, used, and learned.

With this in mind, researchers have begun to develop theories about kinds of concepts that deviate, in certain ways, from the noun or object concepts that have been studied by adherents of the similarity-based views. One interesting example of a proposed kind of concept is the role-governed category11. These concepts also embody our theoretical knowledge of the world, but instead of doing so through the representation of causal relations, they do so in the form of the roles (causal or otherwise) in which the concepts can participate. Motivated by the insights of theory theory, as well as those of Wittgenstein, Markman and Stilwell (2001) argue that some concepts are defined (yes, defined) by their roles in the larger relational systems that compose our general or theoretical knowledge of the world. Take an oversimplified example, from the M&S paper, that of GAME (used, presumably, because of its discussion by Wittgenstein). According to them, GAME cannot be defined by a set of features, and is thus not a feature-based concept like those discussed by the similarity-based models. Instead, it is defined by its role in the relation PLAYS(X,Y), where X is the PLAYER (defined by its role in the relation) and Y is the GAME. This concept is contrasted with another, which has a similar structure, but participates in a different relation, namely JOB, which is defined by its role in the relation WORK. This theory also requires the creation of a third type of concept, relational concepts, which are usually represented by verbs (e.g., PLAY and WORK). Thus, using a theory theory approach to concepts, we can develop at least two potential new types of concepts, which differ in their content and structure from traditional object concepts.

So far, the theory theory looks like a very promising alternative to similarity-based approaches, but because serious research on versions of it has only recently begun, it's too early to tell how well it will fair. As the discussions of the classical, prototype, and exemplar theories of concepts has shown, once you develop a theory of concepts, concepts will come around behind you and bite you in your theoretical ass. New problems will inevitably arise. However, I think it's safe to say that any subsequent theory of concepts will have to take seriously the findings that background knowledge, particularly causal knowledge and folk theoretical knowledge in general, play an important role in our learning, representation, and use of concepts. For this reason, we will not be able to focus exclusively on features in concept representations, or on classification in our tests of theories. We may also have to abandon for good the belief that concepts can be characterized as a single kind of thing.

In the next post, I'll talk about another theory, born of neuroscientific research, which posits types of concepts. After that, I'll try to get into some modal theories of concepts. Then maybe I can leave concepts alone for a while.

1In the interest of full disclosure, I should say that I am an adherent of the theory theory described in this post, that I have written about it, and find it generally superior to all of the previous theories I have described. I will try to be fair in describing it, but it won't be easy.
2 Murphy, G., & Medin, D. (1985). The role of theories in conceptual coherence. Psychological Review, 92(3), 289-316.
3 This may remind the philosophers in the audience of Quine's paper "Natural Kinds," in which he argues that primitive concept-representations (those of primitive societies and children) are similarity-based, but more advanced (modern and adult) concepts are parts of theoretical systems, such as those of the sciences.
4 Medin, D., & Ortony, A. (1989). Psychological essentialism. Similarity and Analogical Reasoning. S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (eds.), Cambridge University Press: New York, pp. 179-195.
5 See e.g., Gopnik, A. & Wellman, H.M. (1994). The theory theory. In L.A. Hirschfeld and S.A. Gelman (eds.), Mapping the mind: domain specificity in cognition and culture. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 257-293; and Gopnik, A., & Nazzi, T. (2003). Words, kinds and causal powers: A theory theory perspective on early naming and categorization. In D. Rakison, & L. Oakes (eds.) Early Categorization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6 Ahn, W. & Kalish, C.W. (2000). The role of mechanism beliefs in causal reasoning. In F.C. Keil & R.A. Wilson (eds.) Explanation and Cognition, MIT Press, pp. 199-225.
7 Rehder, B. (2003). Categorization as causal reasoning. Cognitive Science, 27, 709-748.
8 Malt, B. C., & Smith, E. E. (1984). Correlated properties in natural categories. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 250–269.
9 Rehder, B. (2003). A causal-model theory of conceptual representation and categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 1141-59.
10 Rehder, B., & Ross, B. H. (2001). Abstract coherent categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 1261–1275, and Wisniewski, E. J. (1995). Prior knowledge and functionally relevant features in concept learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 449–468.
11 Markman, A.B., & Stilwell, C.H. (2001). Role-governed categories.
Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 13(4), 329-358.


kiloi said...

nike tnEnter the necessary language
translation, up to 200 bytes winter, moves frequently in Chinanike chaussures showing that the deep strategy of the Chinese market. Harvard Business School, tn chaussures according to the relevant survey data show that in recent years the Chinese market three brands, Adidas, mens clothingpolo shirts Li Ning market share at 21 percent, respectively, 20%, 17%. The brand is first-line to three lines of urban competition for mutual penetration. Side of theworld,announced layoffs, while China's large-scale facilities fists. The sporting goods giant Nike's every move in the winter will be fully s strategy. Years later, the Nike, Inc. announced the world's Fan

kiloi said...

cheap polos
polo shirts
ralph lauren polo shirtssport shoes
ugg boots
puma shoes
chaussures pumamp4
trade chinalacoste polo shirts
chaussure puma femmewedding dressestennis racket
cheap handbags

kiloi said...

MENSCLOTHING mans clothing
cheap ugg boots
converse shoes
wedding dresses
wholesale polo shirts
brand clothingcheap clothing
clothes sportspolos shirtair shoesair shoesed hardy clothinged hardy clothing

haitao said...

cheap hair straighteners
chi hair straightener
chi flat iron

new polo shirts
cheap Lacoste polo shirts
cheap Lacoste polo shirts

cheap handbags
cheap bags
puma chaussures
chaussures puma
chaussure puma

Men's North Face
Women's North Face

hair straighteners
sexy lingerie store
cheap ugg boots
tattoo wholesale
men's clothing
women's clothing

2009 nike shoes
new nike shoes
Women's max
Men's max 93
nike shox
Nike air force
Nike air max 2003
nike air max ltd
nike air max tn
Nike air rift
Nike air Yeezy
nike airmax
Nike air max 90
Nike air max 97
nike birds nest shoes
nike dunk
nike RT1 shoes
nike SB
nike shox shoes
Nike shox OZ shoes
Nike shox R2 shoes
Nike shox R3 shoes
Nike shox R4 shoes
Nike shox R5 shoes
Nike shox TL3
nike trainers lovers

tennis rackets
Wilson tennis rackets
HEAD tennis rackets
Babolat tennis rackets

fdg said...

products said...

China Wholesale has been described as the world’s factory. This phenomenom is typified by the rise of buy products wholesalebusiness. Incredible range of products available with wholesale from china“Low Price and High Quality” not only reaches directly to their target clients worldwide but also ensures that China Wholesalers from China means margins you cannot find elsewhere and China Wholesale will skyroket your profits.

polo shirt said...

Do not mean bad.Thank you so much! I just want to show some fashion wedding dress to all of you. I like wedding dresses, because wedding for a girl, it is the most special day in her life. Do you want to have the beautiful wedding dresses in perfect day??

polo shirt said...

Fantastic! God bless you! Meanwhile, we have the highest quality but the lowest price fashion cheap wedding dresses. Here are the most popular designer wedding dresses and lace wedding dresses for all of you. Also the cheap evening dresses is a great choice for you. Let you dream come ture!!

polo shirt said...

Perfect!! You are a outstanding person! Do you want to wear stunning discount wedding dresses and join the party wearing beautiful cheap prom dresses?? Or you want all people's eyes can't move from you? The evening formal dresses are the best gift for you!

polo shirt said...

Best wishes for you! May be you are interested in party cocktail dresses, and you may need cheap bridesmaid dress for you special Occasions. We can provide cheap cocktail dresses, cheap flower girl dresses even the plus size wedding dresses. You can choose that you like!

Peejay Li said...

I would like to be the supporter of yours. Thank you for sharing such a nice article.
chaussures puma
puma speed cat
Nike Tn Chaussures
requin tn
nike shox
puma shoes
puma CAT
puma basket
puma speed
baskets puma
puma sport
puma femmes
puma shox r4 torch
nike air max requin
nike shox r3
shox rival r3
tn plus
chaussures shox
nike shox r4 torch
air max tn requin
nike tn femme
pas cher nike
tn chaussures
nike rift
nike shox nz
chaussures shox
nike shox rival
shox rival
chaussures requin
jeans online
cheap armani jeans
cheap G-star jeans

lady said...

I like the side of the article, and very like your blog, to write well and hope to continue their efforts, we can see more of your articles. ed hardy clothes. After reading this article has strong feelings, the future will be Changlaikankan's.ed hardy swimwear. polo hoodies
ed hardy jeans
ed hardy
ed hardy clothing
ed hardy t-shirts
ed hardy clothes
ed hardy shirts
ed hardy mens
ed hardy clothes
ed hardy womens
ed hardy sunglasses
ed hardy swimwear
ed hardy Jeans
ed hardy hoodies
ed hardy bags
ed hardy trousers
ed hardy shoes
ed hardy sunglasses
ed hardy suits
ed hardy dresses
ed hardy boots
ed hardy mens sweater
ed hardy womens cotton
ed hardy womens boots

season said...

Your article is very good.I like it very much.
Once upon a time, there was a mouse father.He wanted to marry his daughter to the greatest person in the world.But, who was the greatest person in the world?Oh!
puma ferrari shoes
cheap nike shoesThe sun! He must be the greatest person in the world.The mouse father went to talk to the sun."Hello! Mr. Sun.
puma shoes
ferrari shoes
I know you are the greatest person in the world.Would you marry my daughter?""What? I'm not the greatest person in the world. The greatest person is the cloud.If he comes out, I’ll be covered."
nike shox nz
Ugg Boots
The mouse father went to talk to the cloud. “Hello! Mr. Cloud. I know you are the greatest person in the world. Would you marry my daughter?”
nike 360 air max
nike shox shoes
“What? I’m not the greatest person in the world. The greatest person is the wind.If he comes out, I’ll be blown away.”
cheap puma shoes
puma drift cat
The mouse father went to talk to the wind. “Hello! Mr. Wind. I know you are the greatest person in the world.Would you marry my daughter?” “What? I’m not the greatest person in the world. The greatest person is the wall. If he comes out, I’ll be stopped.”
cheap nike shox
nike air max 360
The mouse father went to talk to the wall. “Hello! Mr. Wall. I know you are the greatest person in the world. Would you marry my daughter?” “What? I’m not the greatest person in the world. The greatest person is YOU, the mouse.” “The greatest person in the world is … mouse?” “Yes, the greatest person in the world is mouse. See? If mouse comes out, I’ll be bit!”
nike air max
pumas shoes
The mouse father was very happy. He finally knew mouse was the greatest person in the world. He would marry his daughter to the handsome mouse next door.
cheap jeans
cheap levis jeans
ed hardy jeans

Apa Saja Dah said...

Find and download what you need at Rapidshare Search Engine.
Top Site List Free Proxy Site Free Download mp3 Michael Jackson song All Michael Jackson Lirics Oes Tsetnoc Mengembalikan Jati Diri Bangsa Download Mp3 Gratis

Anonymous said...


Anonymous said...


Anonymous said...


Anonymous said...

o‰ï‚¢ŒF–{o‰ï‚¢‹ž“so‰ï‚¢ŽOdo‰ï‚¢‹{éo‰ï‚¢‹{èo‰ï‚¢’·–ìo‰ï‚¢’·èo‰ï‚¢“ޗǏo‰ï‚¢VŠƒo‰ï‚¢‘啪o‰ï‚¢‰ªŽRo‰ï‚¢‰«“êo‰ï‚¢‘åão‰ï‚¢²‰êo‰ï‚¢é‹Êo‰ï‚¢Ž ‰êo‰ï‚¢“‡ªo‰ï‚¢Ã‰ªo‰ï‚¢“Ȗ؏o‰ï‚¢“¿“‡

Anonymous said...


Anonymous said...

•Ÿˆäo‰ï‚¢ˆ¤’mo‰ï‚¢Šò•Œo‰ï‚¢Ã‰ªo‰ï‚¢ŽOdo‰ï‚¢•ºŒÉo‰ï‚¢‘åão‰ï‚¢˜a‰ÌŽRo‰ï‚¢Ž ‰êo‰ï‚¢‹ž“so‰ï‚¢“ޗǏo‰ï‚¢ŽRŒûo‰ï‚¢’¹Žæo‰ï‚¢“‡ªo‰ï‚¢‰ªŽRo‰ï‚¢L“‡o‰ï‚¢“¿“‡o‰ï‚¢ìo‰ï‚¢ˆ¤•Qo‰ï‚¢‚’mo‰ï‚¢

Anonymous said...

o‰ï‚¢ŒF–{o‰ï‚¢‹ž“so‰ï‚¢ŽOdo‰ï‚¢‹{éo‰ï‚¢‹{èo‰ï‚¢’·–ìo‰ï‚¢’·èo‰ï‚¢“ޗǏo‰ï‚¢VŠƒo‰ï‚¢‘啪o‰ï‚¢‰ªŽRo‰ï‚¢‰«“êo‰ï‚¢‘åão‰ï‚¢²‰êo‰ï‚¢é‹Êo‰ï‚¢Ž ‰êo‰ï‚¢“‡ªo‰ï‚¢Ã‰ªo‰ï‚¢“Ȗ؏o‰ï‚¢“¿“‡

Anonymous said...

•Ÿˆäo‰ï‚¢ƒJƒtƒFˆ¤’mo‰ï‚¢ƒJƒtƒFŠò•Œo‰ï‚¢ƒJƒtƒFÃ‰ªo‰ï‚¢ƒJƒtƒFŽOdo‰ï‚¢ƒJƒtƒF•ºŒÉo‰ï‚¢ƒJƒtƒF‘åão‰ï‚¢ƒJƒtƒF˜a‰ÌŽRo‰ï‚¢ƒJƒtƒFŽ ‰êo‰ï‚¢ƒJƒtƒF‹ž“so‰ï‚¢ƒJƒtƒF“ޗǏo‰ï‚¢ƒJƒtƒFŽRŒûo‰ï‚¢ƒJƒtƒF’¹Žæo‰ï‚¢ƒJƒtƒF“‡ªo‰ï‚¢ƒJƒtƒF‰ªŽRo‰ï‚¢ƒJƒtƒFL“‡o‰ï‚¢ƒJƒtƒF“¿“‡o‰ï‚¢ƒJƒtƒFìo‰ï‚¢ƒJƒtƒFˆ¤•Qo‰ï‚¢ƒJƒtƒF‚’mo‰ï‚¢ƒJƒtƒF

Anonymous said...

•ŸˆäƒeƒŒƒNƒ‰ˆ¤’mƒeƒŒƒNƒ‰Šò•ŒƒeƒŒƒNƒ‰Ã‰ªƒeƒŒƒNƒ‰ŽOdƒeƒŒƒNƒ‰•ºŒÉƒeƒŒƒNƒ‰‘åãƒeƒŒƒNƒ‰˜a‰ÌŽRƒeƒŒƒNƒ‰Ž ‰êƒeƒŒƒNƒ‰‹ž“sƒeƒŒƒNƒ‰“ޗǃeƒŒƒNƒ‰ŽRŒûƒeƒŒƒNƒ‰’¹ŽæƒeƒŒƒNƒ‰“‡ªƒeƒŒƒNƒ‰‰ªŽRƒeƒŒƒNƒ‰L“‡ƒeƒŒƒNƒ‰“¿“‡ƒeƒŒƒNƒ‰ìƒeƒŒƒNƒ‰ˆ¤•QƒeƒŒƒNƒ‰‚’mƒeƒŒƒNƒ‰

Anonymous said...

•ŸˆäƒZƒtƒŒˆ¤’mƒZƒtƒŒŠò•ŒƒZƒtƒŒÃ‰ªƒZƒtƒŒŽOdƒZƒtƒŒ•ºŒÉƒZƒtƒŒ‘åãƒZƒtƒŒ˜a‰ÌŽRƒZƒtƒŒŽ ‰êƒZƒtƒŒ‹ž“sƒZƒtƒŒ“ޗǃZƒtƒŒŽRŒûƒZƒtƒŒ’¹ŽæƒZƒtƒŒ“‡ªƒZƒtƒŒ‰ªŽRƒZƒtƒŒL“‡ƒZƒtƒŒ“¿“‡ƒZƒtƒŒìƒZƒtƒŒˆ¤•QƒZƒtƒŒ‚’mƒZƒtƒŒ

Anonymous said...

•Ÿˆä•s—ψ¤’m•s—ÏŠò•Œ•s—ϐɪ•s—ÏŽOd•s—Ï•ºŒÉ•s—Ï‘åã•s—Ϙa‰ÌŽR•s—ÏŽ ‰ê•s—Ï‹ž“s•s—Ï“Þ—Ç•s—ÏŽRŒû•s—Ï’¹Žæ•s—Ï“‡ª•s—ωªŽR•s—ύL“‡•s—Ï“¿“‡•s—ύì•s—ψ¤•Q•s—ύ‚’m•s—Ï

Anonymous said...

—D—Ǐo‰ï‚¢ƒTƒCƒgƒAƒ_ƒ‹ƒg“ŽB‘fln—ƒGƒƒAƒjƒAV——Doˆ§‚¢o‡‚¢ŒnƒTƒCƒg‚Å‚ ‚¢deai•s—Ï•s—Ï‚µ‚Ä‚Ý‚Ü‚¹‚ñ‚©•s—σp[ƒgƒi[•s—ψ¤l2ƒVƒ‡ƒbƒgƒ`ƒƒƒbƒgo‰ï‚¢•s—ϐlÈƒNƒŒƒWƒbƒgƒJ[ƒh

zhuneilixu said...

The cold winter, does not seem too for wedding. Most recently, the cold one after another,

hangzhou air temperature pelter, let many wedding in late November bride is due a single wear

gauze or dress, will feel cold, wear too much and feel very bloated. For the bride, the winter is

the biggest test how wedding in temperature and balance between poise.

Don't be too upset, actually this season only fees cheap Wedding Dresses, marriage can create a different

character "winter wedding", also more memorable.

You can use the glittering and translucent white fairy tale, cheap cell phones
,the artistic conception to dress up oneself's wedding, choose blue, green, white ice cold tonal,

decorous atmosphere to create beautiful, Can borrow snow machine and bubble machine build indoor

romantic atmosphere, snowflake, feathers, Christmas tree,cheap cocktail

, even is the element such as silver crystal, can add to your winter wedding dreamy

colour, cheap

you can even in a pile of snowman YingBinChu lovely, guests, we must take it and will

soon be well.
Anothre set of ralph lauren polo in three colors. Ralph

Lauren Polo Shirts
come with a graduation of colors on the chest. The new shiki Cheap polo

shirts logo is on the chest. Comes in all layres and can be worned tucked in or out Wholesale Polo Shirts -50% OFF.
Also comes with sculpted collar and arm cuffs.Flat knit collar, Contrast placket and half

moon, Mothre-of-pearl buttons and tennis tail, Soft double knit piqué,100% cotton ralph lauren

polo shirts. If you lend your embroidrere a sample cheapralph lauren polos that will help you get

the closest match to the original embroidreed design. The artwork you provide will sreve as a

template for your embroidrey set-up but discount ralph lauren polos can't be used to identify some

stitch types, cheap polo shirts Cheap Polo Shirtsgive

precise sizing of embroidreed elements and show thread polo clothing colors.
Wholesale Polo Shirts
Ralph Lauren Polo Shirts
Discount Ralph Lauren Polos

mamamia said...

cheap ghd
ghd straighteners
Benefit GHD
GHD IV Salon Styler
GHD Precious gift
Gold GHD
Kiss GHD
New pink GHD
Pink GHD
Pure Black GHD
Pure White GHD
Purple GHD
Rare GHD
polo boots
polo shoes
cheap straighteners
ghd hair straighteners
hair straighteners
Purple GHD IV Styler
Pure White GHD
Pure Black GHD
Pink GHD IV Styler
Kiss GHD Styler

mamamia said...

Gray GHD IV Styler
Gold GHD IV Styler
GHD Rare Styler
GHD IV Salon Styler
Black GHD IV Styler
Benefit GHD IV Styler

herve leger
herve leger dresses

chanel iman
chanel outlet
chanel handbag
Chanel Wallet
Chanel Watch
chanel purse

Chanel Sunglasses
chanel bags
chanel earrings
chanel jewelry
chanel shoes

my blog said...

i want to show you the following products:
gucci boots
gucci shoes
gucci t-shirt
gucci bags
gucci handbags
gucci clothing
gucci watch
gucci sunglasses
gucci jewelry
gucci boots
gucci shoes
gucci t-shirt
gucci bags
gucci handbags
gucci clothing
gucci watch
gucci sunglasses
gucci jewelry
gucci boots
gucci shoes
gucci t-shirt
gucci bags
gucci handbags
gucci clothing
gucci watch
gucci sunglasses
gucci jewelry

Hanthan said...

Armani Sunglasses
Burberry Sunglasses
Cartier Sunglasses
Chanel Sunglasses
Coach Sunglasses
D&G Sunglasses
Dior Sunglasses
ED Hardy Sunglasses
Fendi Sunglasses
LV Sunglasses
Oakley Sunglasses
Police Sunglasses
Ray Ban Sunglasses
Roberto Cavalli Sunglasses
Versace Sunglasses
cheap gucci sunglasses
cheap prada sunglasses
cheap D&G sunglasses
discount gucci sunglasses
discount prada sunglasses
discotunt D&G sunglasses
cheap oaklay sunglasses
discount oaklay sunglasses
sunglasses outlet
air max,Nike air max
air max 90
nike air max 90
air max 1
air max 95
nike air max 360
nike air max ltd
air max ltd
air max 360
air max classic,Air Max Huarache

Hanthan said...

air max light
air max bw
air max plus
air max 180
air max nike
air max TN
air max 87
air max 2010
air max outlet
timberland boots
timberland shoes
cheap timberland boots
timberland uk
timberland 2010
timberland outlet
Coach new bags
Chanel new bags
D&G new bags
Burberry new bags
Prada new bags
ED Hardy new bags
CHOLE new bags
Fendi new bags
Dooney&Bourke new bags
Juicy new bags
LV new bags
Gucci new bags

macafe said...

That'Good Post.
China Business
Hong Kong Business
International Business
Business Opportunities
China Manufacturer
China Market
Computer Peripheral
That a thank you