Tuesday, May 02, 2006

Craving a Cigarette Warps Your Sense of Time

As anyone who's ever tried to quit smoking can attest, craving a cigarette can warp the way you think about just about anything. In a great example of this "warped" thinking in the literature1, sadistic experimenters approached German university students (who, as we know, all smoke) as they were leaving a 90-minute class, and asked if they wanted to participate in a 10-minute experiment. They were told that if they participated, they would get a cup of coffee and would be able to participate in a raffle. Half of the students who agreed to participate were tested in the classroom where smoking was prohibited, and half were taken out into the hallway. When the latter half were taken out into the hallway, the experimenter (also German, therefore also a smoker) lit up a cigarette, and predictably, the students who'd just sat through a 90-minute smokeless lecture quickly did the same, without being explicitly prompted to do so. These were the low need-to-smoke participants. The participants who were kept in the classroom to complete the study couldn't smoke (that's the sadistic part), and were thus the high need-to-smoke participants. The first part of the study completed by all participants was billed as "an investigation of the perception of objects in daily use," and presented them with a page containing 14 pictures of cigarettes of different lengths (between 80 and 90mm, arranged left-to-right by length). The participants were asked to indicate which cigarette "reflected the true length of a standard cigarette." As you've probably guessed by now, the students in the high need-to-smoke condition chose longer cigarettes as representative of the standard cigarette than did those in the low need-to-smoke condition. And that was only a manipulation check. In the main task, high need-to-smoke participants actually seemed to treat money as less valuable than the low need-to-smoke participants (an instance of what the authors term the devaluation effect). If smoking makes money seem less valuable, it's no wonder higher taxes on smoking products don't deter many smoker!

Anyway, warped perceptions of cigarette length, and the devaluation of money, are cool, but this post is about time perception. I'm sure everyone who's smoked has experienced minutes feeling like hours while craving a cigarette. Apparently inspired by stories of this experience from smokers (or having experienced it themselves), Sayette et al2 recently set out to explore the relationship between cigarette cravings and time perception. In their first experiment, participants were divided into nicotine-deprived and non-deprived conditions, and during the initial screening session, participants in the nicotine-deprived condition were told not to smoke for 12 hours before the experimental session, while non-deprived participants were told to smoke as they usually would (to test whether they complied with these instructions, participants' carbon monoxide levels were tested during screening and at the beginning of the experimental session, and the two tests were compared). Upon arriving for the experimental session, participants in the two conditions were given one of two kinds of cues. For the non-deprived participants, a box was placed on the table in front of them, and they were instructed to open it. Inside was a roll of tape, and they were instructed to pick it up and hold it in their hands. The nicotine-deprived participants weren't so lucky. A box was placed on the table in front of them, and they were told to open it. Inside was a pack of cigarettes (their own pack, which they had given the experimenter upon arriving) and a lighter. In an act of unprecedented sadism, the experimenters told the participants to pick up the cigarettes and the lighter, light a cigarette without putting it in their mouth, and then hold it (without smoking it). This was meant to increase their cravings.

While the participants were holding their objects (the roll of tape or the lit cigarette), they completed a 12-item questionnaire, and were then asked how long they had been holding the item (a "retrospective" estimation). After that, they were all told that they could smoke in exactly 2 1/2 minutes, and were then told to indicate to the experimenter when they believed 45 and 90 seconds had passed (a "prospective" estimation).

As every smoker would expect, participants in the deprived condition slightly overestimated the amount of time that had passed in the retrospective estimation, and indicated that 45 and 90 seconds had passed before they actually had, in the prospective condition. Their estimates were different from the non-deprived participants, who actually tended to underestimate the amount of time that had passed. Interestingly, the deprived participants' estimates were more accurate, overall, than those of the non-deprived participants. This is likely because, in the time-estimation literature, people tend to underestimate the amount of time that has passed, just as the non-deprived participants did. The fact that the non-deprived participants were more accurate, and even overestimated how much time has passed, is an indication that the cravings really did affect their time perception. However, the difference between the deprived and non-deprived conditions was statistically significant only in the 45-second estimate, but in each case, the deprived participants' estimates were longer than those of the non-deprived participants.

In their second experiment, a new group of participants (which were called the "experience group") who'd also gone 12 hours prior to the experimental session without a cigarette were shown the box, opened it, picked up the cigarette, lit it, but were not able to smoke it even after the 2 1/2 minute period. They were then asked to sit quietly in the experiment room after 5, 10, 15, 25, 35, and 45 minutes, were asked to rate their "urge to smoke" on a 100 point scale. The nicotine-deprived participants from the first experiment had been asked, right after they had begun to hold their newly lit cigarette that they could not smoke, to estimate their "urge to smoke" at the same time intervals. For this second experiment, these participants were called the "anticipate group."

The comparison of interest is between the ratings over time for the experience group, and the estimate ratings for the anticipate group over the same time period. For the experience group (black bars in the graph below), the "urge to smoke" ratings did not change significantly over the 45 minutes. The anticipate group (white bars), however, predicted that their cravings would increase dramatically over time. The difference between the two groups was significant. Here is the graph of the data (from Figure 1, p. 91):


Now these are experienced smokers, so you would think that they'd have a good handle on how their cravings act over time, but obviously something about having the craving in at this moment distorts your perception of how it will change over time if you do not smoke a cigarette.
The importance of this study for counseling is pretty clear. As the authors note, smoking relapses are closely related to cravings, and if people believe that their cravings will increase over time, and furthermore, actually perceive time as going by more slowly, they will have a harder time resisting those cravings. What's important, then, is to educate people about the actual behavior and effects of cravings, showing them that cravings don't actually get worse over time (though notably, they don't appear to get any better, either). As someone who had to go through the process of quitting smoking, I can definitely appreciate the value of that knowledge. One of the more difficult aspects of quitting is an intense craving that overwhelms your ability to think about much of anything besides cigarettes, and the fear that not only are you going to suffer more, but that if you don't do something about this craving right now, it's going to get worse, and you're not going to get anything accomplished. Of course, this information alone isn't going to get people to quit smoking, but it may help them when they try. And from the experiment I described at the beginning of this post, we also know that offering them raffle tickets for cash won't help, and that really big cigarettes will look extra attractive.

1Brendl, C.M., Markman, A.B., & Messner, C. (2003). The Devaluation Effect: Activating a Need Devalues Unrelated Objects. Journal of Consumer Research, 29, 463-473
2Sayette, M.A, Loewenstein, G., Kirchner, T.R., & Travis, T. (2005). Effects of smoking urge on temporal cognition. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 19(1), 88-93.

15 comments:

Anonymous said...

Hi Chris,

>>One of the more difficult aspects of quitting is an intense craving that overwhelms your ability to think about much of anything besides cigarettes, and the fear that not only are you going to suffer more, but that if you don't do something about this craving right now, it's going to get worse, and you're not going to get anything accomplished.

Great point, the awareness that this is not true, can really help people quitting. I might fall into the category of professional cigarette quitters, as I have quit 4-5 times,each time for considerable amount of time, from half-year to 8 years. Now, having started to smoke again each time, I guess I'm not real quitter :), but here are my additional thoughts on this:

The chain is strong as its weakest link, one moment of "weakness" can ruin the whole quitting. But people usually overestimate the power of their Will. They do not avoid the situations which they know might cause them such weakness, even put unlit cigars in their mouths. Fulfilling urges is not just about decision, it is not just mental thing, to do something one must do it in the world. So objective obstacles are as good in quiting smoking, they put additional threshold. Friends should be nice enough and aware that they can present additional threshold there. And awareness that the urge DOES go away should present additional motivation for all people there... Those objective obstacles to smoking are not something that will have to last some long time. It is worth putting some extra-efforts in. After all, it takes just 2-3 weeks. After this I feel urge to quit smoking. Again. :)

Anonymous said...

I wish they would have studied perception of length and time for things unrelated to cigarettes.

I remember a study reported in the past few years that claimed to show smokers who had quit smoking had a distorted view of time for about three days, but I don't remember how they measured that. I'd have to do a better search to find it. I did find an article in science daily from 2003, but I don't know if that's the one I remember since it does not mention the three day window.

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2003/05/030512074344.htm

Chris said...

anon, I don't think I know of the three-day research, but I am familiar with the study in the sciencedaily article, and earlier work on smoking and time perception. Most of the previous work has been somewhat equivocal, and has been focused on smokers vs. non-smokers more than on cravings. What I really liked about this study was the way they induced cravings. After 12 hours, and a smoking-related cue (holding a lit cig in your hand!), you're going to want a cigarette.

Heo said...

This study sounds almost as ethical as the "high need-to-pee" experiments conducted every morning from ~1975- 1990 in my 5 siblings/1 bathroom house.

Chris said...

Heo, and was your sense of time warped in the "high need-to-pee" condition?

West Stand Upper said...

I am quitting at the moment and its good to read anything on what the hell is going on during this horrible period. On one hand (perhaps my rational self) I feel a joy taking over, at having last got free – on the other hand I have this horrible sulky feeling that never ever again will I enjoy a lovely ciggy out of my bedroom window under the stars…booo hoo. Basically, I’m three days in without a ciggy, and its hell. That’s what I am trying to say. But, yes, it will get better. Well written piece, enjoyed it.

Anonymous said...

Chantix is VERY bad for you. This pill did nothing to help me stop smoking, as I smoked just as much if not more while on the Chantix. This pill also messed with my brains train of thought. I could not think as clearly and found myself confused and disoriented at times. Not to mention the CHRONIC stomach aches as well as constant vomiting.

Stay away from this pill.

Anonymous said...

The electronic cigarette never made me lose my since of time... cool blog though

luci said...

it's really interesting fact,but it can't help anybody,couse everywhere u can read the same thing,that smoking can cause a lot of diseases like cancer, heart disease and emphysema,or u r wasting so much money for it,but nobody's care about it,and almost nobody want or can quit smoking.....now there is new
electronic cigarette...no tobacco,no tar,no smell,saves money,no stained teeth,and u have choice-with or without nicotine,this way to help them to be healthier and fight against of regular cigarettes......

E Cigarette said...

When i'm in class and cant have a cigarette it feels like forever, but now i use electric smokes and my teacher lets me use them in class.

Anonymous said...

Smoking and Drug addiction are major social, economic, and public health problems. They are not diseases, but a choices.Those who struggle with Smoking, alcohol addiction or drug addiction, drug addiction treatment centers are the only solutions for them.

Anonymous said...

araç sorgulama
sorgulama
ehliyet
açıköğretim
bağkur sorgulama
ssk sorgulama
emekli sandığı
cinsellik
radyo dinle
korku
evlilik
hikaye
gazeteler
ilan
ssk
ehliyet sınav sonuçları
iş ilanları
bağkur
gazete oku

Unknown said...

No matter what product you purchase from us north face jacketsWe are offering you a wide range ofnorth face outletquestion,Some color combinations seem to never get old north face outerwearBut within the same community north face coatsbecause it features just the right amount of north face uk,look at another good paoduct such as Dior totes,A little of these are given below.ugg bootswas a very well-known French fashionable boot
cheap ugg boots,because of the wisdom of brilliant featuresdiscount ugg boots,which you are buying is unique and original classic ugg boots,When possible, they obtain materials from domestic suppliers ugg classic tall boots,which makes it exclusive and uniquebabyliss,I like the other two designs as wel Benefit GHD,A stroll around the park with the GHD IV Salon Styler,They're also used to buy GHD Mini Styler,A stroll around the park with GHD Precious gift,They're also used to help prevent
GHD Rare Styler,Following the success of the initial gray ghd,The extremity of the sole is gold ghd
And those who buy this ghd Instyler,people who work outside and so wearisome Kiss ghd,I would recommend moving up to pink ghd,If your own walks or intentions for this pure black ghd,I wouldn’t hesitate to recommend the pure white ghd,our price is very reasonable purple ghd

Unknown said...

Nike air jordan 2010
basketball air jordan shoes
cheap Jordan shoes outlet
jordan
discount jordan shoes
jordan
jumpman23
Jordan ajf shoes
cheap LV bags
discount Gucci bags
newest Dooney&Bourke handbags
Chanel handbags outlet
Burberry handbags 2010
newest air max
cheap air max shoes
air max
air max outlet
air max nike
cheap timberland
discount timberlands
timberland Boots
cheap timberland uk
discount timberland outlet
GHD hair straightener wholesale

Unknown said...

Twisted Heart